The concept is nice, but this game needs a better tutorial. I had to lose a few times before I understood why I was losing.

First of all, it's not clear if the requirements are combined by an OR or an AND.
At first I thought that if the requirements where "color: blue; shape: diamond" I needed to accept all blue diamonds, while I actually needed to accept all blue objects and all diamond shaped objects.

The other problem I've had was with some of the classes. For example, when someone starts playing, they have no idea what a "normal" sized object is. It would be nice to have an example of each size class on the tutorial for this.

Finally, I feel that the "feedback sound" (the one that tells you if you made a mistake or not) comes too late, so its hard to find out what was the cause of your mistake.

Man, you should have a hard job to make this game, is very cool :D

Sorry my English i'm brazilian and i don't speak so much :D

It's a bit complicated but is innovative, good work!

Very cool concept, however, I didn't know all of your definitions (e.g. small, tilted, etc.).

Nice idea - I think the execution could be made a bit friendlier.

A tutorial level would help a lot - where there was no winning or losing, but if you made a mistake it explained how your decision violated the checklist.

I like the concept, but this game needs a little bit of polish.

The tutorial is needed, I thought the objects need to satisfy all requirements. Also the size is pretty unclear.

Also the screens with score and instructions are pretty annoying, I just wanna play again. (And they are slow).

And there should be bigger time window, when you can click on the object. Sometimes I know what I should do with it, but I am just a little bit late.

Overall - great concept, thanks for the game! :-)

Concept is ok. But there are some problems. The descriptions are not always clear and my clicks are not always registered.

I like the concept, but I did not understand at first if it was "or" or "and".

Great concept! The game was fun and challenging, and the graphics were functional.

Some of the terms were hard to recognize, since they were relative (small vs. normal vs. large for instance)

Nice take on the theme!